|
More than
90% of all organizations use some sort of selection interview.
Why are interviews so popular? Interviews give you a chance
to discuss areas that are important to job performance.
This is true whether they are used alone or with preemployment
selection tests. For example, if you are looking for a
candidate with great oral communication skills or with
a lot of work experience, a job interview can
probably add to the information you can get from a test.
In fact, interviews can measure certain things better
than tests.
The goal of an interview is to learn something about the
candidate that you do not already know and need to know
to decide if they can do the job. To do this, a job interview
must contain meaningful questions that get factual, job
related answers. A structured interview provides the questions
to be asked each applicant and a preset scoring scale.
Since the best predictor of someones future behavior
is their current and past behavior, interview questions
designed to get descriptions of the candidates behaviors
and experiences are particularly valuable. Structured
interviews help you make better hiring decisions and are
defensible. This is important because under US law, interviews
are held to the same standards as tests. Properly developed
and implemented interviews result in:
- A
review of federal equal employment litigation shows
that a judgment for the defendant is up to 11 times
more likely than a judgment for the plaintiff when the
interview in question is structured and job-related.
- In
a study of 14 organizations (including international
finance, energy, and health care organizations) that
began using behaviorally-based structured interviews,
turnover decreased an average of 44%.
- Division
general managers in a Fortune 50 company who were selected
with a structured behavioral interview exceeded their
revenue growth goals by an average of 12% more than
executives selected without a similar interview.
- In
a nationwide retailer, a CMI designed structured interview
reduced turnover by 45%, increased minority retention
by 54%, and saved the company $7 million in 2 years.
|